Friday, May 14, 2010

This simply defies common sense, and is contrary to the core purpose behind the city’s adoption of the ethics ordinance. The commission should be mindful that the ethics ordinance was adopted to protect the public’s interest in transparent and accountable government, not to shield public officials from culpability for their wrongdoing.”

— Ethics Commission’s lawyer re: Nancy Graham’s request to drop or reduce her violations from 34 to 1

Share this post

PinIt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

scroll to top